home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: osse.nrl.navy.mil!jung
- From: jung@osse.nrl.navy.mil (Greg Jung)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.datacomm,demon.tech.amiga
- Subject: Re: Is MUI processor intensive?
- Date: 8 Feb 1996 16:58:14 GMT
- Organization: NRL, Washington, D.C. - Code 7650
- Sender: jung@osse.nrl.navy.mil ()
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <4fda36$fve@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
- References: <9601300825.AA003em@hectortd.demon.co.uk> <487.6609T1155T528@login.dknet.dk>
- Reply-To: jung@osse.nrl.navy.mil ()
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ossen.nrl.navy.mil
- X-Newsreader: mxrn 6.18-32
-
-
- In article <487.6609T1155T528@login.dknet.dk>, nilo@login.dknet.dk (Nicolai Thilo) writes:
- |>In article <9601300825.AA003em@hectortd.demon.co.uk>, Paul Copsey (paul@hectortd.demon.co.uk) wrote:
- |>
- |>>> Anyway, he's trying to use AVM voicemail software and that
- |>>> requires MUI. Now, my theory is MUI is processor intensive
- |>
- |>>Ahh, the magic word, yes MUI is processor intensive, very.
- |>
- |>Of course, it also has a lot more features.
- |>
- |>>Even on an
- |>>030/50 it's bad. :-(
- |>
- |>You are spoiled by the speed of gadtools. I happily use MUI on my
- |>7MHz A2000 with a slow 30MB harddisk and 3MB RAM.
- |>
- Oh, I get it now. We are to use the amiga as a test of patience,
- independence, and endurance. The smaller, the slower, the better,
- and the more virtuous is the user.
- Therefore a software that will slow me
- down even more will increase this burden of virtue.! :)
-